ISSN 2490-3329 (Print)
ISSN 2303-7954 (Online)

Volume 49, Issue 2, Article 6

(Scr Med 2018:49:112-117)

The Value Assessment of Clinical Trials Based on Electrophysiologically Verified Lumboischialgia

Draško Prtina1,2, Dragan Ostojić1, Alma Prtina2

1 Institute for Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation “Dr Miroslav Zotović”, Banja Luka
2 Faculty of Medicine, University of Banja Luka, Banja Luka, Republic of Srpska, Bosnia and Herzegovina


DOI 10.7251/SCMED1802112P
UDC 616.833.58-009.7
COBISS.RS-ID 7837720



Introduction: Lumboischialgia is defined as pain in the distribution of ischemic nerve caused by a pathological change in the nerve itself, whereas lumbago is a localized spondylogenic pain that is not followed by a neurological deficit, and is a consequence of muscular bone dysfunction of the lumbosacral region. Previous studies which investigated the value of clinical trials in the diagnosis of lumboischialgia did not find a high sensitivity and specificity in those tests.

Objective: Our objective was to define clinical tests that indicate the existence of radiculopathy and to determine the value of the overall diagnostic finding in relation to the findings of the EMNG examination.

Methods: The sample consisted of 100 patients of both genders, aged 18-65. The inclusive criteria were: strong lower back pain propagating in one of both legs and lasting for 1-3 months and the medical history suggesting a radicula lesion. Non-inclusion criteria were the following: symptoms of cauda equine, acute febrile condition, existence of tumors, vertebral fractures, lesions of central motoneuron, inability to perform the EMNG examination, acute psychotic conditions, operations of the spine and pregnancy. Immediately before each EMNG examination, medical history was taken with defined questions on the existence of pain stronger in the leg than in the spine, dermatome deficit, pain during labor and weakness in the leg.

Results: Patients usually have a total of two (31%) and three (26%) positive clinical signs of lumboischialgia. By statistical analysis, three clinical trials proved to be discriminatory in terms of verification of radiculopathy: positive Lazarevic test, paresis of a particular muscle group, and absence or reduction of the patellar or Achilles reflex. After processing with logistic regression, the statistically predictive value is retained by a positive Lazarevic test. The analysis of the surface under ROC curve shows that the positivity of four or more clinical tests is statistically the best limit value, with a specificity of 67% and a sensitivity of 56%.

Conclusion: The conducted study indicates the statistical significance of the frequency of positive clinical trials: Lazarevic test, objective muscular weakness and absent reflex, in persons with electrophysiologically verified lumboischialgia.

Key words: clinical signs, radiculopathy, electromyoneurography


Pdf version of article




1. Koes BW, Tulder MW van, Ostelo R, Burton AK, Waddwll G. Clinical guidelines for the menagement of low back pain in primari care: an international comparison. Spine. 2001;26:2504-13.
2. Hippocrates (460-370 BC). The Genuine Works of Hippocrates. Translation- Adams F. London: Sydenham Society, 1849.
3. Lazarević LK. Ischias postica Cotunnii – Jedan prilog za njenu diferencijalnu dijagnozu. Srp Arh Celok Lek 1880;7:23-35.
4. Lazarević LK. Ischias postica Cotunnii Ein Beitrag zu deren Differential-Diagnose Allg Wien Med Zeitung 1884;38:437-8.
5. Kishner S, Gündüz H, Munshi S. Electrodiagnosis in lumbar spinal stenosis a review. Turk J Phys Med Rehab 2010;56:75-80.
6. Rubinstein SM, von Tulder M. A best-evidence review of diagnosis procedures for neck and low-back pain. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2008;22(3):471-82.
7. Heydari A, Nargol AV, Jones AP, Humphrey AR. EMG analysis of lumbar paraspinal muscles as a predictor of the risc of low-back pain. Eur Spine J 2010;19(7):1145-52.
8. Cho, S.C, Ferrante, M.A, Levin, K.H, Harmon, R.L, So, Y.T. Utility of electrodiagnostic testing in evaluating patients with lumbosacral radiculopathy: an evidence-based review. Muscle Nerve 2010; 42: 276–282
9. SPSS 15.0 Command Syntax Reference 2006, Chicago Ill., USA: SPSS Inc., 2006.
10. Deyo RA, Mirza SK, Martin BI. Back pain prevalence and visit rates: estimates from U.S. national surveys, 2002. Spine 2006;31:2724-7.
11. Hoogen HJMM, KOES BW,van Eijck JTM. On the accurancy of history, phisical examination and erythrocyte sedimentation rate in diagnosis low-back pain in general practice. Spine 1995;20:318-27.
12. Vroomen PCAJ, de Krom MCTFM, Knottnerus JA. Diagnostic value of history and physical examination in patients with sciatica due to disc herniation; a systematic review. J Neurol.1999;246:899-906.
13. Murade E, Neto JS, Avanzi O. Study of relationship and importance of clinical semiology, axial computet tomography and electroneuromyography in lumbar radiculopathies. Acta Ortop Bras 2002;10(4):18-25.
14. Knotnerus JA. The effects of disease verifiaction and referral on there releationship between symptoms and disease. Med Desic Making.1987;7:139-48.
15. Deville WL, van der Windt DA, Dzaferovic A, Bezemer PD, Bouter LM. The test of Lasegue: systematic review of the accuracy in diagnosis herniated discs. Spine 2000;25(9):1140-7.
16. Rabin A, Gerszten PC,Karausky P, Bunker CH, Potter DM, Welch WC. The sensitivity of the seated straigth-leg raise test compared with the supine straight-leg raise test in patient presenting with magnetic resonance imaging evidence of lumbar nerve root compression. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2007;88(7):840-3.

Corresponding author:
Draško Prtina
e-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it

Manuscript received: October 15th, 2018
Manuscript accepted: October 25th, 2018